Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: extent-tree: Ensure btrfs_trim_fs can trim the whole fs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 21.11.2017 09:21, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> [BUG]
> fstrim on some btrfs only trims the unallocated space, not trimming any
> space in existing block groups.
> 
> [CAUSE]
> fstrim_range passed in by default fstrim will be:
> 
> range->start = 0
> range->len = fs_size (which equals with super->total_bytes)
> range->min_len = 512
> 
> However btrfs_trim_fs() following above parameter to search block groups
> to trim.
> 
> While it's quite possible that all chunks start beyond
> super->total_bytes if the fs is balanced several times.
> 
> In that case, btrfs will skip trimming block groups and only trim the
> unallocated space of each device.
> 
> [FIX]
> For common full fs trimming range passed in, extent its len to (u64)-1
> so we will iterate all block groups.
> 
> And for custom fs trimming range, due to the fact that the range will
> always be truncated by range [0, super->total_bytes), making custom fs
> trimming range useless.
> 
> Just return -ENOTTY for custom fs trimming range.
> 
> Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>

I think we want this tagged for stable ?


> ---
>  fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index 3a252d7af158..22bbcc8c4f6c 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -11024,12 +11024,31 @@ int btrfs_trim_fs(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct fstrim_range *range)
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * try to trim all FS space, our block group may start from non-zero.
> +	 * NOTE: Btrfs uses its own logical address space, where its first
> +	 * chunk can start anywhere if it wants.
> +	 * If we follow common start = 0 and len = fs_size from @range, we
> +	 * can end up without trimming any block groups, since it's highly
> +	 * possible all chunks start beyond that range.
> +	 *
> +	 * So if we want to trim the whole fs, extent the len to (u64)-1 to trim
> +	 * all block groups.
> +	 *
> +	 * Also, since @range will always be truncated to fs size, manually
> +	 * passing range to trim specified range doesn't make much sense.
> +	 * (No mean to trim any block group whose bytenr starts beyond
> +	 *  @total_bytes)
> +	 * So in that case, return -ENOTTY directly to prevent any custom trim
> +	 * request.
>  	 */
> -	if (range->len == total_bytes)
> -		cache = btrfs_lookup_first_block_group(fs_info, range->start);
> -	else
> -		cache = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, range->start);
> +	if (range->start == 0 && range->len == total_bytes) {
> +		range->len = (u64)-1;
> +	} else {
> +		btrfs_info(fs_info,
> +		"trimming custom range is not supported due to the limitation of fstrim_range");
> +		return -ENOTTY;
> +	}
> +
> +	cache = btrfs_lookup_first_block_group(fs_info, range->start);
>  
>  	for (; cache; cache = next_block_group(fs_info, cache)) {
>  		if (cache->key.objectid >= (range->start + range->len)) {
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux