On 11/17/2017 03:08 AM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
On 12.11.2017 12:56, Anand Jain wrote:If the device is not present at the time of (-o degrade) mount the mount context will create a dummy missing struct btrfs_device. Later this device may reappear after the FS is mounted. So this patch handles that case by going through the open_device steps which this device missed and finally adds to the device alloc list. So now with this patch, to bring back the missing device user can run, btrfs dev scan <path-of-missing-device> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx> --- This patch needs: [PATCH 0/4] factor __btrfs_open_devices() fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index d24e966ee29f..e7dd996831f2 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -769,8 +769,47 @@ static noinline int device_list_add(const char *path, rcu_string_free(device->name); rcu_assign_pointer(device->name, name); if (device->missing) { - fs_devices->missing_devices--; - device->missing = 0; + int ret; + struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = fs_devices->fs_info; + fmode_t fmode = FMODE_READ | FMODE_WRITE | FMODE_EXCL; + + if (btrfs_super_flags(disk_super) & BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_SEEDING) + fmode &= ~FMODE_WRITE; + + /* + * Missing can be set only when FS is mounted. + * So here its always fs_devices->opened > 0 and most + * of the struct device members are already updated by + * the mount process even if this device was missing, so + * now follow the normal open device procedure for this + * device. The scrub will take care of filling the + * missing stripes for raid56 and balance for raid1 and + * raid10. + */ + ASSERT(fs_devices->opened); + mutex_lock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex); + mutex_lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex); + ret = btrfs_open_one_device(fs_devices, device, fmode, + fs_info->bdev_holder); + if (!ret) { + fs_devices->missing_devices--; + device->missing = 0; + btrfs_clear_opt(fs_info->mount_opt, DEGRADED); + btrfs_warn(fs_info, + "BTRFS: device %s devid %llu uuid %pU joined\n", + path, devid, device->uuid); + } + + if (device->writeable && + !device->is_tgtdev_for_dev_replace) { + fs_devices->total_rw_bytes += device->total_bytes; + atomic64_add(device->total_bytes - + device->bytes_used, + &fs_info->free_chunk_space); + } + device->in_fs_metadata = 1; + mutex_unlock(&fs_devices->fs_info->chunk_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);nit: You did add the fs_info local var, so for consistency's sake use that
Thanks. Will fix it. -Anand
} }
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
