On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 16:12:56 -0800 Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:32:33PM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > > Don't pop the champagne just yet, I just read that apprently 4.14 broke > > bcache for some people [1]. Not sure how much that affects you, but it might > > well make things worse. Yeah, I know, wonderful. > > Oh my, that's actually pretty terrible. > I've just reverted both my machines to 3.13, the last thing I need is more > btrfs corruption. Why so far back though, the latest 4.4 and 4.9 are both good series and run without issues for me since a long time. Or perhaps you meant 4.13 :) > I'm also starting to question if I should just drop bcache. It does help > access to a big and slow-ish array, but corruption and periodic btrfs > full rebuilds is not something I can afford to do timewise :-/ I suggest that you try lvmcache instead. It's much more flexible than bcache, does pretty much the same job, and has much less of the "hacky" feel to it. -- With respect, Roman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
