On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Chris Murphy <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> The final bug about backref counts mismatch, without the image I'm not >> really sure what's going on. >> >> (But extent tree verification is really buggy though) > > Ahh I imaged the wrong file system! Sorry about that: > > >>>ERROR: extent[366498091008, 134217728] referencer count mismatch >>>(root: 827, owner: 73782, offset: 134217728) wanted: 4, have: 26 > >>>Complete output, with filtered btrfs-debug-tree info for extent >>>address 366498091008. >>>https://drive.google.com/open?id=1LUMtLIc1LcXhYN3twFcxTyFuJ6ScMlyQ > > Here is the image for that two device raid1: > > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1LO96omP3BQh9C3ZYVXoUDT4-H8P5lZ6D > By the way, this one is done with -ss. But it has many failures to compute collisions, hundreds of files/dirs with 4 characters or less. -- Chris Murphy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
