Re: Should cp default to reflink?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Obviously (for me) yes, but who will decide? There should be --no-reflink for people trying to defragment something.

>Seems to me any request to duplicate should be optimized by default
>with an auto reflink when possible, and require an explicit option to
>inhibit.

Key word is "any". I much more often use rsync than cp within the same volume. 
-- 

With Best Regards,
Marat Khalili
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux