New test case to test if the minimal device size given by "mkfs.btrfs"
failure case is valid.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
---
tests/mkfs-tests/010-small-image/test.sh | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tests/mkfs-tests/010-small-image/test.sh
diff --git a/tests/mkfs-tests/010-small-image/test.sh b/tests/mkfs-tests/010-small-image/test.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..304c87057304
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/mkfs-tests/010-small-image/test.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+# test if the reported minimal size of mkfs.btrfs is valid
+
+source "$TOP"/tests/common
+
+check_prereq mkfs.btrfs
+check_prereq btrfs
+
+setup_root_helper
+
+do_test()
+{
+ # Well, 1M small enough to fail, we just use the output
+ # to get the minimal device size
+ prepare_test_dev 1M
+ output=$(run_mustfail_stdout "mkfs.btrfs for small image" \
+ "$TOP"/mkfs.btrfs -f $@ "$TEST_DEV")
+ good_size=$(echo "$output" | grep -oP "(?<=is )\d+")
+
+ prepare_test_dev "$good_size"
+ run_check "$TOP"/mkfs.btrfs -b $good_size -f $@ "$TEST_DEV"
+ run_check_mount_test_dev
+ run_check_umount_test_dev
+}
+
+do_test -n 4k -m single -d single
+do_test -n 4k -m single -d dup
+do_test -n 4k -m dup -d single
+do_test -n 4k -m dup -d dup
+
+do_test -n 8k -m single -d single
+do_test -n 8k -m single -d dup
+do_test -n 8k -m dup -d single
+do_test -n 8k -m dup -d dup
+
+do_test -n 16k -m single -d single
+do_test -n 16k -m single -d dup
+do_test -n 16k -m dup -d single
+do_test -n 16k -m dup -d dup
+
+do_test -n 32k -m single -d single
+do_test -n 32k -m single -d dup
+do_test -n 32k -m dup -d single
+do_test -n 32k -m dup -d dup
+
+do_test -n 64k -m single -d single
+do_test -n 64k -m single -d dup
+do_test -n 64k -m dup -d single
+do_test -n 64k -m dup -d dup
--
2.14.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
