Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] btrfs: match btrfs_device->mode same as it used for open

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 31.10.2017 04:11, Anand Jain wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/30/2017 10:39 PM, David Sterba wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:07:15PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>>> We aren't setting the FMODE_WRITE when initializing btrfs_device
>>> structure and when calling blkdev_put, however we are setting it
>>> only when calling blkdev_get_by_path().
>>
>> But this still does not say why this is a problem worth fixing. Nikolay
>> asked for it, and I would do the same, but why do we even have to ask
>> for that?
> 
>  Here its just a cleanup of miss match of open mode and close modes.>  And there isn't any problem that I noticed.

Even if that's the case, please state that explicitly in your changelog
and also put "No functional changes" if you expect it to not introduce
any change in behavior.


> 
> Thanks, Anand
> 
> 
>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes
>>
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux