Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: ins: fix arg order in print_inode_item()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2017年10月30日 16:10, Misono, Tomohiro wrote:
> In the print_inode_item(), the argument order of sequence and flags are
> reversed:
> 
> printf("... sequence %llu flags 0x%llx(%s)\n",
> 				... 
> 	       (unsigned long long)btrfs_inode_flags(eb,ii),
>  	       (unsigned long long)btrfs_inode_sequence(eb, ii),
> 				...)
> 
> So, just fix it.

Not related to this patch, but considering you're going to enhance
root_item creation, it's also a good idea to print such info like
c/o/s/r time and parent/receive UUID.

More patches will never be a bad thing.

Thanks,
Qu
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  print-tree.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/print-tree.c b/print-tree.c
> index 3c585e3..8abd760 100644
> --- a/print-tree.c
> +++ b/print-tree.c
> @@ -896,8 +896,8 @@ static void print_inode_item(struct extent_buffer *eb,
>  	       btrfs_inode_uid(eb, ii),
>  	       btrfs_inode_gid(eb, ii),
>  	       (unsigned long long)btrfs_inode_rdev(eb,ii),
> -	       (unsigned long long)btrfs_inode_flags(eb,ii),
>  	       (unsigned long long)btrfs_inode_sequence(eb, ii),
> +	       (unsigned long long)btrfs_inode_flags(eb,ii),
>  	       flags_str);
>  	print_timespec(eb, btrfs_inode_atime(ii), "\t\tatime ", "\n");
>  	print_timespec(eb, btrfs_inode_ctime(ii), "\t\tctime ", "\n");
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux