Re: btrfs seed question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Not quite.  While the seed device is still connected I would like to
force some files over to the rw device.  The use case is basically a
much slower link to a seed device holding significantly more data than
we currently need.  An example would be a slower iscsi link to the seed
device and a local rw ssd.  I would like fast access to a certain subset
of files, likely larger than the memory cache will accommodate. >>> If at a later time I want to discard the image as a whole I could
>>> unmount the file system or


  Interesting. If you had not brought the idea of using seed device,
  I would have still thinking about bcache device as a solution for
  the above use case.

  However bcache device won't help to solve the further use case
  requirements as below..


if I want a full local copy I could delete the
seed-device to sync the fs.  In the mean time I would have access to
all the files, with some slower (iscsi) and some faster (ssd) and the
ability to pick which ones are in the faster group at the cost of one
content transfer.

  I am thinking why not indeed leverage seed/sprout for this.
  Let me see how I (or if anyone could) allocate time to experiment
  on this.

 Thanks for your use case !

-Anand
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux