[PATCH] btrfs: use appropriate replacements for __sb_{start,end}_write calls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Commit a53f4f8e9c8eb ("btrfs: Don't call btrfs_start_transaction() on
frozen fs to avoid deadlock.") started using internal calls and we
replace them with more suitable ones.

Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/super.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index 35a128a..99c21ae 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -1205,8 +1205,8 @@ int btrfs_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
 			 * happens. The pending operations are delayed to the
 			 * next commit after thawing.
 			 */
-			if (__sb_start_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE, false))
-				__sb_end_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE);
+			if (sb_start_write_trylock(sb))
+				sb_end_write(sb)
 			else
 				return 0;
 			trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 0);
-- 
2.5.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux