Re: Btrfs performance with small blocksize on SSD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Sun, 24 Sep 2017 19:43:05 +0300
schrieb Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@xxxxxxxxx>:

> 24.09.2017 16:53, Fuhrmann, Carsten пишет:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > 1)
> > I used direct write (no page cache) but I didn't disable the Disk
> > cache of the HDD/SSD itself. In all tests I wrote 1GB and looked
> > for the runtime of that write process.  
> 
> So "latency" on your diagram means total time to write 1GiB file? That
> is highly unusual meaning for "latency" which normally means time to
> perform single IO. If so, you should better rename Y-axis to something
> like "total run time".

If you look closely it says "Laufzeit" which visually looks similar to
"latency" but really means "run time". ;-)


-- 
Regards,
Kai

Replies to list-only preferred.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux