Re: Help Recovering BTRFS array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Duncan,

I'm not sure if this will attache to my original message...

Thank you for your reply. For some reason i'm not getting list messages even tho i know i am subscribed.

I know all to well about the golden rule of data. It has bitten me  a few times. The data on this array is mostly data that i don't really care about. I was able to copy off what i wanted. The main reason i sent it to the list was just to see if i could somehow return the FS to a working state without having to recreate. I'm just surprised that all 3 copies of the super block got corrupted. Probably my lack of understanding but i always assumed that if one copy got corrupted it would be replaced by a good copy therefore leaving all copies in a good state. Is that not the case. If it is then what back luck that all 3 got messed up at same time. 

Some information i forgot to include in my original message

uname -a
Linux thebeach 4.12.13-gentoo-GMAN #1 SMP Sat Sep 16 15:28:26 ADT 2017 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2320 CPU @ 3.00GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

btrfs --version
btrfs-progs v4.10.2

Anyways thank you again for your reply. I will leave the FS intact for a few days in case anymore details could help the development of BTRFS and maybe avoid this happening or having a recovery option.

Marc


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux