Re: BUG: BTRFS and O_DIRECT could lead to wrong checksum and wrong data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



May I state my user's point of view:

I know one applications that uses O_DIRECT, and it is subtly broken on BTRFS. I know no applications that use O_DIRECT and are not broken. (Really more statistics would help here, probably some exist that provably work.) According to developers making O_DIRECT work on BTRFS is difficult if not impossible. Isn't it time to disable O_DIRECT like ZFS does AFAIU? Data safety is certainly more important than performance gain it may or may not give some applications.

--

With Best Regards,
Marat Khalili

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux