Re: dead links in wiki about why not using lz4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2017-09-12 12:19 GMT+03:00 Alberto Bursi <alberto.bursi@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Since zstd was added in btrfs there are people wondering why not lz4 too.
>
> The wiki paragraph [1] cites a couple dead links as explanations on why
> it's not a good idea to have lz4 in btrfs.
>
> I think it would be nice if someone can write that information back in
> the wiki, or for the very least write them in a mailing list message
> that can be linked there.
>
>
> -Alberto
>
>
> 1. https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ#Will_btrfs_support_LZ4.3F
>

AFAIK Problem description:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=140181084426296&w=2

-- 
Have a nice day,
Timofey.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux