On 2017/08/25 2:37, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:39:53PM +0900, Misono, Tomohiro wrote:
"btrfs inspect-internal rootid <path>" rejects a file to be specified in
the implementation.
Therefore change "file or directory" to "directory" in the doc.
Is there a reason why a file should not be accepted? The ioctl supports
that just fine.
I thought ioctl would work for file, but current code checks whether
<path> is directory or not in the first place. So, I change the doc.
If it is better to change the code rather than the doc, I will do that.
What do you think?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
