Re: [PATCH 1/7] Btrfs: fix blk_status_t/errno confusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:45:59PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx>
> 
> This fixes several instances of blk_status_t and bare errno ints being
> mixed up, some of which are real bugs.

Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>

The real bugs are lurking in the error cases, other than BLK_STS_OK that
is equivalent to the old return values.

Seems like blk_status_t conversion of raid56.c has been entirely
skipped, and maybe some of the changes brought by the btrfs pull. Thanks
for catching it. I'll prepare a pull request with this one for 4.13-rc7.
The other patch 2/7 is not that urgent and can wait.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux