Re: [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: Add sanity check for EXTENT_DATA when reading out leaf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2017年08月22日 19:00, Nikolay Borisov wrote:


On 22.08.2017 13:57, Nikolay Borisov wrote:


On 22.08.2017 10:37, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Add extra checker for item with EXTENT_DATA type.
This checks the following thing:
1) Item size
    Plain text inline file extent size must match item size.
    (compressed inline file extent has no info about its on-disk size)
    Regular/preallocated file extent size must be a fixed value.

2) Every member of regular file extent item
    Including alignment for bytenr and offset, possible value for
    compression/encryption/type.

3) Type/compression/encode must be one of the valid values.

This should be the most comprehensive and restrict check in the context
of btrfs_item for EXTENT_DATA.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@xxxxxxx>
---
  fs/btrfs/disk-io.c              | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h |  1 +
  2 files changed, 89 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 59ee7b959bf0..557f9a520e2a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -549,6 +549,83 @@ static int check_tree_block_fsid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
  		   btrfs_header_level(eb) == 0 ? "leaf" : "node",	\
  		   reason, btrfs_header_bytenr(eb), root->objectid, slot)
+static int check_extent_data_item(struct btrfs_root *root,
+				  struct extent_buffer *leaf, int slot)
+{
+	struct btrfs_file_extent_item *fi;
+	u32 sectorsize = root->fs_info->sectorsize;
+	u32 item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot);
+
+	fi = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_file_extent_item);
+
+	if (btrfs_file_extent_type(leaf, fi) >= BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_LAST_TYPE) {
+		CORRUPT("invalid file extent type", leaf, root, slot);
+		return -EIO;
+	}
+	if (btrfs_file_extent_compression(leaf, fi) >= BTRFS_COMPRESS_LAST) {
+		CORRUPT("invalid file extent compression", leaf, root, slot);
+		return -EIO;
+	}
+	if (btrfs_file_extent_encryption(leaf, fi)) {
+		CORRUPT("invalid file extent encryption", leaf, root, slot);
+		return -EIO;
+	}
+	if (btrfs_file_extent_type(leaf, fi) == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE) {
+		if (btrfs_file_extent_compression(leaf, fi) !=
+		    BTRFS_COMPRESS_NONE)
+			return 0;
+		/* Plaintext inline extent size must match item size */
+		if (item_size != BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE_DATA_START +
+		    btrfs_file_extent_ram_bytes(leaf, fi)) {
+			CORRUPT("plaintext inline extent has invalid size",
+				leaf, root, slot);
+			return -EIO;
+		}
+		return 0;
+	}

One more thing - don't we really want to use -EUCLEAN rather than -EIO?

Nice suggestion.
Since it's not really something wrong with IO routine, EUCLEAN is better.



+
+
+	/* regular or preallocated extent has fixed item size */
+	if (item_size != sizeof(*fi)) {
+		CORRUPT(
+		"regluar or preallocated extent data item size is invalid",
+			leaf, root, slot);
+		return -EIO;
+	}
+	if (!IS_ALIGNED(btrfs_file_extent_ram_bytes(leaf, fi), sectorsize) ||
+	    !IS_ALIGNED(btrfs_file_extent_disk_bytenr(leaf, fi), sectorsize) ||
+	    !IS_ALIGNED(btrfs_file_extent_disk_num_bytes(leaf, fi),
+			sectorsize) ||
+	    !IS_ALIGNED(btrfs_file_extent_offset(leaf, fi), sectorsize) ||
+	    !IS_ALIGNED(btrfs_file_extent_num_bytes(leaf, fi), sectorsize)) {
+		CORRUPT(
+		"regular or preallocated extent data item has unaligned value",
+			leaf, root, slot);
+		return -EIO;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int check_leaf_item(struct btrfs_root *root,
+			   struct extent_buffer *leaf, int slot)
+{
+	struct btrfs_key key;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, slot);

nit: We already have the key in the proper format in the caller of this
function. Why not just pass in the type as an argument and save a
redundant call for every item in a leaf? Perhaps it's a
microoptimisation but for very densely populated trees the miniature
cost might build up.

Sounds valid. Considering how many times this item_key_to_cpu() get called in a large leaf,
micro-optimization counts.

I'll update this in next revision.

Thanks for your review,
Qu


+	/*
+	 * Considering how overcrowded the code will be inside the switch,
+	 * complex verification is better to moved its own function.
+	 */
+	switch (key.type) {
+	case BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY:
+		ret = check_extent_data_item(root, leaf, slot);
+		break;
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+
  static noinline int check_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root,
  			       struct extent_buffer *leaf)
  {
@@ -605,9 +682,13 @@ static noinline int check_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root,
  	 * 1) key order
  	 * 2) item offset and size
  	 *    No overlap, no hole, all inside the leaf.
+	 * 3) item content
+	 *    If possible, do comprehensive sanity check.
+	 *    NOTE: All check must only rely on the item data itself.
  	 */
  	for (slot = 0; slot < nritems; slot++) {
  		u32 item_end_expected;
+		int ret;
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, slot); @@ -650,6 +731,13 @@ static noinline int check_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root,
  			return -EIO;
  		}
+ /*
+		 * Check if the item size and content meets other limitation
+		 */
+		ret = check_leaf_item(root, leaf, slot);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+
  		prev_key.objectid = key.objectid;
  		prev_key.type = key.type;
  		prev_key.offset = key.offset;
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h
index 10689e1fdf11..3aadbb74a024 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h
@@ -732,6 +732,7 @@ struct btrfs_balance_item {
  #define BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE 0
  #define BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_REG 1
  #define BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_PREALLOC 2
+#define BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_LAST_TYPE	3
struct btrfs_file_extent_item {
  	/*

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux