[PATCH] btrfs-progs: Doc: Fix asciidoc grammar of btrfs-rescue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Code block of kernel backtrace lacks leading change line, causing the
following man page result:
------
           One can determine whether zero-log is needed according to the
           kernel backtrace:

           ? replay_one_dir_item+0xb5/0xb5 [btrfs]
           ? walk_log_tree+0x9c/0x19d [btrfs]
           ? btrfs_read_fs_root_no_radix+0x169/0x1a1 [btrfs]
           ? btrfs_recover_log_trees+0x195/0x29c [btrfs]
           ? replay_one_dir_item+0xb5/0xb5 [btrfs]
           ? btree_read_extent_buffer_pages+0x76/0xbc [btrfs]
           ? open_ctree+0xff6/0x132c [btrfs]

       + If the errors are like above, then zero-log should be used to clear
       the log and the filesystem may be mounted normally again. The keywords
------

Not only "+" is rendered as is, but also wrong indent.

Fix it by adding change line before code block.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@xxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/btrfs-rescue.asciidoc | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/btrfs-rescue.asciidoc b/Documentation/btrfs-rescue.asciidoc
index a9b471fe..24b619c6 100644
--- a/Documentation/btrfs-rescue.asciidoc
+++ b/Documentation/btrfs-rescue.asciidoc
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ or less if the commit was implied by other filesystem activity.
 +
 One can determine whether *zero-log* is needed according to the kernel
 backtrace:
++
 ----
 ? replay_one_dir_item+0xb5/0xb5 [btrfs]
 ? walk_log_tree+0x9c/0x19d [btrfs]
-- 
2.14.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux