Re: Btrfs + compression = slow performance and high cpu usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[ ... ]

> This is the "storage for beginners" version, what happens in
> practice however depends a lot on specific workload profile
> (typical read/write size and latencies and rates), caching and
> queueing algorithms in both Linux and the HA firmware.

To add a bit of slightly more advanced discussion, the main
reason for larger strips ("chunk size) is to avoid the huge
latencies of disk rotation using unsynchronized disk drives, as
detailed here:

  http://www.sabi.co.uk/blog/12-thr.html?120310#120310

That relates weakly to Btrfs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux