Re: Best Practice: Add new device to RAID1 pool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Marat Khalili <mkh@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>> This may be a stupid question , but are your pool of butter (or BTRFS pool)
>>> by any chance hooked up via USB? If this is USB2.0 at 480mitb/s then it is
>>> about 57MB/s / 4 drives = roughly 14.25 or about 11MB/s if you shave off
>>> some overhead.
>>
>>Nope, USB 3. Typically on scrubs I get 110MB/s that winds down to
>>60MB/s as it progresses to the slow parts of the disk.
>
> It could have degraded to USB2 due to bad connection/loose electrical contacts. You know USB3 needs extra wires, and if it lost some it'd connect (or reconnect) in USB2 mode. I'd check historical kernel messages just in case, and/or unmount and reconnect to be sure.

Actually I'm wrong, the device I was testing for this thread is SATA.
What confused me is the thread is about raid1 and my Btrfs raid1 is
USB 3. But anyway all devices scrub at 100+MB/s but balance is much
slower than even 1/2.


-- 
Chris Murphy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux