Re: [PATCH] btrfs: qgroups: Fix BUG_ON condition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 03:09:42PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2017年07月12日 14:42, Nikolay Borisov 写道:
> > The current code was erroneously checking for root_level > BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL. If
> > we had a root_level of 8 then the check won't trigger and we could
> > potentially hit a buffer overflow. The correct check should be
> > root_level >= BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL
> 
> Thanks for catching this.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@xxxxxxx>
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 4 ++--
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> > index 4ce351efe281..3b787915ef31 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> > @@ -1603,7 +1603,7 @@ int btrfs_qgroup_trace_subtree(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> >   	struct extent_buffer *eb = root_eb;
> >   	struct btrfs_path *path = NULL;
> >   
> > -	BUG_ON(root_level < 0 || root_level > BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL);
> > +	BUG_ON(root_level < 0 || root_level >= BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL);
> >   	BUG_ON(root_eb == NULL);
> >   
> >   	if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLED, &fs_info->flags))
> > @@ -2959,7 +2959,7 @@ static int __btrfs_qgroup_release_data(struct inode *inode,
> >   	if (free && reserved)
> >   		return qgroup_free_reserved_data(inode, reserved, start, len);
> >   	extent_changeset_init(&changeset);
> > -	ret = clear_record_extent_bits(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, start,
> > +	ret = clear_record_extent_bits(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, start,
> >   			start + len -1, EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED, &changeset);
> 
> I didn't recongize it's a tailing white space at first.

The original code is from you, so please configure your editor to
hilight trailing whitespace. Whitespace damage happens, git am warns
about tha but git cherry-pick does not.

> Nice catch.

So before we start seeing patches that fix random whitespace in
unrelated code: please don't do that.

As you wrote, it was not obvious that there was no change on the line,
this just slowed down reading the patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux