The current code was erroneously checking for root_level > BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL. If we had a root_level of 8 then the check won't trigger and we could potentially hit a buffer overflow. The correct check should be root_level >= BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx> --- fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c index 4ce351efe281..3b787915ef31 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c @@ -1603,7 +1603,7 @@ int btrfs_qgroup_trace_subtree(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct extent_buffer *eb = root_eb; struct btrfs_path *path = NULL; - BUG_ON(root_level < 0 || root_level > BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL); + BUG_ON(root_level < 0 || root_level >= BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL); BUG_ON(root_eb == NULL); if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLED, &fs_info->flags)) @@ -2959,7 +2959,7 @@ static int __btrfs_qgroup_release_data(struct inode *inode, if (free && reserved) return qgroup_free_reserved_data(inode, reserved, start, len); extent_changeset_init(&changeset); - ret = clear_record_extent_bits(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, start, + ret = clear_record_extent_bits(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, start, start + len -1, EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED, &changeset); if (ret < 0) goto out; -- 2.7.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
