From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx>
In a heavy write scenario, we can end up with a large number of pinned bytes.
This can translate into (very) premature ENOSPC because pinned bytes
must be accounted for when allowing a reservation but aren't accounted for
when deciding whether to create a new chunk.
This patch adds the accounting to should_alloc_chunk so that we can
create the chunk.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 33d979e9ea2a..88b04742beea 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -4377,7 +4377,7 @@ static int should_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
{
struct btrfs_block_rsv *global_rsv = &fs_info->global_block_rsv;
u64 num_bytes = sinfo->total_bytes - sinfo->bytes_readonly;
- u64 num_allocated = sinfo->bytes_used + sinfo->bytes_reserved;
+ u64 num_allocated = sinfo->bytes_used + sinfo->bytes_reserved + sinfo->bytes_pinned;
u64 thresh;
if (force == CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE)
--
2.11.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
