Re: Stability status of btrfs-convert...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 03:07:14PM +0530, Shyam Prasad N wrote:
> I'm planning to use the btrfs-convert tool to convert production data
> in ext4 filesystem into btrfs.
> What is the stability status of this feature?

It has been recently (btrfs-progs 4.6) rewritten nearly from scratch.  This
was a year ago and from the lack of complaints recently it sounds like any
major bugs should be ironed out -- assuming you're using a version of -progs
new enough.

On the other hand, if you'd want use -progs older than that, I'd recommend
also using raid5 and qgroups _and_ cat </dev/urandom >/dev/the_filesystem,
so you have no misguided hopes about the safety of your data. :)

> Can I know the reason why? Is it because most existing ext4
> filesystems are already converted?

Most of us recreate the filesystem from scratch, that's the safer way.
Also, defrag + full-balance are slower than just copying everything in, thus
the only things to gain are short downtime (both defrag and balance work
online) and no need for temp storage.

> Is this tool supported, at least? Can I use this tool as a part of
> software upgrade to change the data filesystem to btrfs?

You do have backups, right?


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ 
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ A dumb species has no way to open a tuna can.
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ A smart species invents a can opener.
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ A master species delegates.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux