Re: [PATCH 0/6] add sanity check for extent inline ref type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2017-05-26 3:26 GMT+03:00 Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>Patch 6 adds scrub support to detect the corruption, so users can be
noticed when they do scrub on a regular basis.
>I'm not sure in the real world what may result in this corruption

I've caught this type of corruption in the wild. The big rsync backup
always ends with a kernel crash due to BUG() statement in
ctime.h:1779. After applying this patchset and running scrub I've got
following messages:

[sivan@fruestuck ~]$ dmesg | grep "invalid extent inline"
[ 8812.428673] eb 4631634034688(tree block) invalid extent inline ref type 0
[ 8812.429148] BTRFS error (device sdb1): scrub: extent
2994741510144(0x2b944810000) has an invalid extent inline ref type,
ignored.
[ 8812.430086] eb 4631634034688(tree block) invalid extent inline ref type 0
[ 8812.430569] BTRFS error (device sdb1): scrub: extent
2994741559296(0x2b94481c000) has an invalid extent inline ref type,
ignored.

How to find the cause of the corruption? Should I try to fix it, or it
is not dangerous for the filesystem? If I should, how to do that?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux