On Sun, 21 May 2017 19:54:05 +0300 Timofey Titovets <nefelim4ag@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry, but i know about subpagesize-blocksize patch set, but i don't > understand where you see conflict? > > Can you explain what you mean? > > By PAGE_SIZE i mean fs cluster size in my patch set. This appears to be exactly the conflict. Subpagesize blocksize patchset would make it possible to use e.g. Btrfs with 4K block (cluster) size on a MIPS machine with 64K-sized pages. Would your checking for PAGE_SIZE still be correct then? > So if and when subpage patch set would merged, PAGE_SIZE should be > replaced with sector size, and all continue work correctly. I guess Duncan's question was why not compare against block size from the get go, rather than create more places for Chandan to scour through to eliminate all "blocksize = pagesize" assumptions... -- With respect, Roman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
