On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:38:34AM -0400, jeffm@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx>
>
> If we have to recover relocation during mount, we'll ultimately have to
> evict the orphan inode. That goes through the reservation dance, where
> priority_reclaim_metadata_space and flush_space expect fs_info->fs_root
> to be valid. That's the next thing to be set up during mount, so we
> crash, almost always in flush_space trying to join the transaction
> but priority_reclaim_metadata_space is possible as well. This call
> path has been problematic in the past WRT whether ->fs_root is valid
> yet. Commit 957780eb278 (Btrfs: introduce ticketed enospc
> infrastructure) added new users that are called in the direct path
> instead of the async path that had already been worked around.
>
> The thing is that we don't actually need the fs_root, specifically, for
> anything. We either use it to determine whether the root is the
> chunk_root for use in choosing an allocation profile or as a root to pass
> btrfs_join_transaction before immediately committing it. Anything that
> isn't the chunk root works in the former case and any root works in
> the latter.
>
> A simple fix is to use a root we know will always be there: the
> extent_root.
>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
-liubo
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v4.8+
> Fixes: 957780eb278 (Btrfs: introduce ticketed enospc infrastructure)
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index be54776..9894c4e 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -4834,7 +4834,7 @@ static int may_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> spin_unlock(&delayed_rsv->lock);
>
> commit:
> - trans = btrfs_join_transaction(fs_info->fs_root);
> + trans = btrfs_join_transaction(fs_info->extent_root);
> if (IS_ERR(trans))
> return -ENOSPC;
>
> @@ -4852,7 +4852,7 @@ static int flush_space(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> struct btrfs_space_info *space_info, u64 num_bytes,
> u64 orig_bytes, int state)
> {
> - struct btrfs_root *root = fs_info->fs_root;
> + struct btrfs_root *root = fs_info->extent_root;
> struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
> int nr;
> int ret = 0;
> @@ -5052,7 +5052,7 @@ static void priority_reclaim_metadata_space(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> int flush_state = FLUSH_DELAYED_ITEMS_NR;
>
> spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
> - to_reclaim = btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size(fs_info->fs_root,
> + to_reclaim = btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size(fs_info->extent_root,
> space_info);
> if (!to_reclaim) {
> spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
> --
> 1.8.5.6
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
