[PATCH] btrfs: fix bool type in btrfs_page_exists_in_range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We use only a simple bool indicator, int is not a problem here.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 5e71f1ea3391..85591d3f3ad9 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -7356,7 +7356,7 @@ noinline int can_nocow_extent(struct inode *inode, u64 offset, u64 *len,
 bool btrfs_page_exists_in_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t start, loff_t end)
 {
 	struct radix_tree_root *root = &inode->i_mapping->page_tree;
-	int found = false;
+	bool found = false;
 	void **pagep = NULL;
 	struct page *page = NULL;
 	int start_idx;
-- 
2.12.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux