On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 07:27:23AM -0500, Sargun Dhillon wrote: > What do you think about putting this behaviour behind a sysctl? Seems > better than to start introducing a new mechanism of marking tasks? Technically it's easy to add own btrfs-specific ioctl, temporarily turning off quota limits, but I'm still not sure about all the consequences as this would apply to the whole system, no? The capabilities are per process, much more fine grained. I don't have other ideas how to address the problem though. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
