Hi Qu,
The commit 81fb6f77a026 (btrfs: qgroup: Add new trace point for
qgroup data reserve) added the following events which aren't used.
btrfs__qgroup_data_map
btrfs_qgroup_init_data_rsv_map
btrfs_qgroup_free_data_rsv_map
I wonder if it is better to remove or keep it for future use.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
cc: quwenruo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
include/trace/events/btrfs.h | 36 ------------------------------------
1 file changed, 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/btrfs.h b/include/trace/events/btrfs.h
index a3c3cab643a9..5471f9b4dc9e 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/btrfs.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/btrfs.h
@@ -1270,42 +1270,6 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(btrfs__workqueue_done, btrfs_workqueue_destroy,
TP_ARGS(wq)
);
-DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(btrfs__qgroup_data_map,
-
- TP_PROTO(struct inode *inode, u64 free_reserved),
-
- TP_ARGS(inode, free_reserved),
-
- TP_STRUCT__entry_btrfs(
- __field( u64, rootid )
- __field( unsigned long, ino )
- __field( u64, free_reserved )
- ),
-
- TP_fast_assign_btrfs(btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb),
- __entry->rootid = BTRFS_I(inode)->root->objectid;
- __entry->ino = inode->i_ino;
- __entry->free_reserved = free_reserved;
- ),
-
- TP_printk_btrfs("rootid=%llu ino=%lu free_reserved=%llu",
- __entry->rootid, __entry->ino, __entry->free_reserved)
-);
-
-DEFINE_EVENT(btrfs__qgroup_data_map, btrfs_qgroup_init_data_rsv_map,
-
- TP_PROTO(struct inode *inode, u64 free_reserved),
-
- TP_ARGS(inode, free_reserved)
-);
-
-DEFINE_EVENT(btrfs__qgroup_data_map, btrfs_qgroup_free_data_rsv_map,
-
- TP_PROTO(struct inode *inode, u64 free_reserved),
-
- TP_ARGS(inode, free_reserved)
-);
-
#define BTRFS_QGROUP_OPERATIONS \
{ QGROUP_RESERVE, "reserve" }, \
{ QGROUP_RELEASE, "release" }, \
--
2.10.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
