On Wed 19-04-17 10:21:39, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
>
>
> On 04/19/2017 01:45 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> >> + if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) {
> >> + if (!blk_queue_nowait(q)) {
> >> + err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >> + goto end_io;
> >> + }
> >> + if (!(bio->bi_opf & REQ_SYNC)) {
> >
> > I don't understand this check at all..
>
> It is to ensure at the block layer that NOWAIT comes only for DIRECT
> calls only. I should probably change it to REQ_SYNC | REQ_IDLE.
Ouch. Checking 'REQ_SYNC' for this is
a) unreliable hack
b) layering violation
You just don't care why someone marked bio with REQ_NOWAIT at this place.
Just obey the request if you can, return error if you cannot, but advisory
REQ_SYNC or REQ_IDLE flags have nothing to do with the ability of the block
layer to submit the bio without blocking...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html