On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 06:15:04PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 04:01:59AM +0530, Lakshmipathi.G wrote:
> > Test script to recover damaged primary superblock using backup superblock.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lakshmipathi.G <Lakshmipathi.G@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for the test, a few comments below.
>
> > ---
> > .../019-fix-superblock-corruption/test.sh | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100755 tests/misc-tests/019-fix-superblock-corruption/test.sh
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/misc-tests/019-fix-superblock-corruption/test.sh b/tests/misc-tests/019-fix-superblock-corruption/test.sh
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 0000000..95815e4
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/misc-tests/019-fix-superblock-corruption/test.sh
> > @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> > +#!/bin/bash
> > +#
> > +# Corrupt primary superblock and restore it using backup superblock.
> > +#
> > +
> > +source $TOP/tests/common
> > +
> > +check_prereq btrfs-select-super
> > +check_prereq btrfs
> > +
> > +setup_root_helper
> > +prepare_test_dev 512M
> > +
> > +FIRST_SUPERBLOCK_OFFSET=65536
> > +
> > +test_superblock_restore()
> > +{
> > + run_check $SUDO_HELPER $TOP/mkfs.btrfs -f $TEST_DEV
> > +
> > + # Corrupt superblock checksum
> > + dd if=/dev/zero of=$TEST_DEV seek=$FIRST_SUPERBLOCK_OFFSET bs=1 \
> > + count=4 conv=notrunc &> /dev/null
> > + # Run btrfs check to detect corruption
> > + $TOP/btrfs check $TEST_DEV >& /dev/null && \
> > + _fail "btrfs check should detect corruption"
>
> No run_check? In general all test output is desired and should be in the
> test log so you can use 'run_mayfail'. Also, please keep the entier
> output and don't redirect it to /dev/null .
>
> > + # Copy backup superblock to primary
> > + run_check $TOP/btrfs-select-super -s 1 $TEST_DEV
> > +
> > + echo "Performing btrfs check" &>> $RESULTS
>
> Use _log for that
>
> > + $TOP/btrfs check $TEST_DEV &>> $RESULTS
>
> Use run_check
>
> > + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
> > + _fail "Failed to fix superblock."
>
> And this would be unnecessary.
>
> I've added a section to tests/README.md to describe the common coding
> practices. Feel free to read/update/fix. Older tests could violate the
> recommendations so at least new tests are in line and we'll update the
> rest incrementally.
Just sent a new patch(v4), addressing above review comments.thanks.
Cheers.
Lakshmipathi.G
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
