> The proposed "move whole chunks" implementation helps only if > there are enough unallocated chunks "below the line". If regular > 'balance' is done on the filesystem there will be some, but that > just spreads the cost of the 'balance' across time, it does not > by itself make a «risky, difficult, slow operation» any less so, > just spreads the risk, difficulty, slowness across time. Isn't that too pessimistic? Most of my filesystems have 90+% of free space unallocated, even those I never run balance on. For me it wouldn't just spread the cost, it would reduce it considerably. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
