On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 12:07:35AM +0100, Benedikt Morbach wrote: > clone needs to resolve the paths of the involved subvolumes in the target > fs from their UUIDs. When doing so it might need to strip the prefix > that is mounted as the root of the fs from those paths. > > It didn't do so correctly when processing the source of "clone" commands > > This is a regression test for > btrfs-progs: receive: handle root subvol path in clone > --- > > fstest for the patch mentioned above (see also https://mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg61848.html) > > I thought I'd send this to linux-btrfs first as I'm not sure what the policy is > wrt submitting fstests aren't fixed upstream yet. Sending tests in advance is a common practice, failing test can be expected on older kernels or installed btrfs-progs. In this case it's not a kernel bug/feature test so I'm not entirely sure if fstests is the right testsuite. I have adated this test and added it to the btrfs-progs. > It's my first fstest and even though the other tests were helpful and it seems > to work, I still assume I've made a couple of mistakes here and there. IIRC fstests do not use the execution wrappers like run_check and there could be more. If you want to continue, please resend to fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, but as far as I'm concerned the test in btrfs-progs is almost done (the fssum utility needs to be added). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
