On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 07:25:01PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > All callers dereference the 'tm' parameter before it gets to this > function, the NULL check does not make much sense here. Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, -liubo > > Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c > index 1192bc7d2ee7..2c3c943bfcdc 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c > @@ -453,8 +453,6 @@ __tree_mod_log_insert(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct tree_mod_elem *tm) > struct rb_node *parent = NULL; > struct tree_mod_elem *cur; > > - BUG_ON(!tm); > - > tm->seq = btrfs_inc_tree_mod_seq(fs_info); > > tm_root = &fs_info->tree_mod_log; > -- > 2.10.1 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
