On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 06:11:56PM -0800, Liu Bo wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:33:55AM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > > None of the checks need to know the RO/RW status. > > > > OK...there was a readonly check, which lets us skip all checks, > it was removed by the below commit, should we add the check back? All the current checks do not modify the superblock, so it's read-only and we can keep it as-is. The superblock is available from inside the function anyway so we don't need to check sb_flags externally. I'll update the changelog. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
