At 02/13/2017 10:30 PM, David Sterba wrote:
Make ulist_fini externally visible so the ulist API is complete.
Looks good to me.
While I'm not pretty sure if the name "ulist_fini" is good enough.
Maybe "ulist_finish" or "ulist_release" (just like release_path and
free_path)?
Thanks,
Qu
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/ulist.c | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/ulist.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ulist.c b/fs/btrfs/ulist.c
index b1434bb57e36..5deee56434fc 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ulist.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ulist.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ void ulist_init(struct ulist *ulist)
* This is useful in cases where the base 'struct ulist' has been statically
* allocated.
*/
-static void ulist_fini(struct ulist *ulist)
+void ulist_fini(struct ulist *ulist)
{
struct ulist_node *node;
struct ulist_node *next;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ulist.h b/fs/btrfs/ulist.h
index 007b22fff3f9..1a4130443d7e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ulist.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ulist.h
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ struct ulist {
};
void ulist_init(struct ulist *ulist);
+void ulist_fini(struct ulist *ulist);
void ulist_reinit(struct ulist *ulist);
struct ulist *ulist_alloc(gfp_t gfp_mask);
void ulist_free(struct ulist *ulist);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html