Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix wrong argument for btrfs_lookup_ordered_range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 07:06:18AM -0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 01:49:09PM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 03:58:51 PM Liu Bo wrote:
> > > Commit "d0b7da88 Btrfs: btrfs_page_mkwrite: Reserve space in sectorsized units"
> > > did this, but btrfs_lookup_ordered_range expects a 'length' rather than a
> > > 'page_end'.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Is this a candidate for stable?
> > > 
> > >  fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> > > index 4e02426..366cf0b 100644
> > > --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> > > +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> > > @@ -9023,7 +9023,7 @@ int btrfs_page_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > >  	 * we can't set the delalloc bits if there are pending ordered
> > >  	 * extents.  Drop our locks and wait for them to finish
> > >  	 */
> > > -	ordered = btrfs_lookup_ordered_range(inode, page_start, page_end);
> > > +	ordered = btrfs_lookup_ordered_range(inode, page_start, PAGE_SIZE);
> > >  	if (ordered) {
> > >  		unlock_extent_cached(io_tree, page_start, page_end,
> > >  				     &cached_state, GFP_NOFS);
> > > 
> > 
> > Thanks for fixing this,
> > Reviewed-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > As for the question about whether this commit should be merged into the stable
> > trees ... I am not sure about that since I don't notice any sort of filesystem
> > corruption that can be caused by the current code i.e. With the existing code,
> > apart from any ordered extents that map the page in question, we are most
> > likely to be *unnecessarily* starting i/o on ordered extents that don't map
> > the file offset range covered by the page. Chris, Josef or David, Please let
> > us know your thoughts on this.
> 
> It could be a performance regression which causes fault writes have
> unnecessary waits instead of a real corruption.

Does not seem to be urgent for stable, but I'll consider it next time
doing a stable round updates.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux