2016-06-28 23:11 GMT+03:00 Otto Kekäläinen <otto@xxxxxxxxx>: > Hello! > > A patch with this subject was submitted in May 2014: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg33777.html > > I don't see it among any of the ~360 open issues at > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&component=btrfs > > Unless somebody objects, I'll file it as a NEW issue with patch. > > > I think the work done by Hugo Mills for this one is important and it > would be a pity if those patches were forgotten. It is one of those > things where btrfs could outperform zfs, which has not bitflip > recovery. Btrfs could have one, and it would be great. > > I personally came across a machine with a bitflipped index and I would > love to test these patches. I am however reluctant to invest time in > it if there is no issue in the bug tracker and no visible progress. > Without proper tracking all debugging/feedback would go in vain. I eventually went ahead and filed this as https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17447 It would be very cool if the bitflip recovery patch was merged. It is one of those things where btrfs could outperform zfs. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
