Re: [PATCHv2 00/24] tree-log inode vs btrfs_inode cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 19.01.2017 20:21, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:31:26AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>> So here is a new set of patches cleaning up tree-log function 
>> w.r.t inode vs btrfs_inode. There are still some which remain 
>> but I didn't find compelling arguments to cleaning them up, so 
>> I've left them unchanged. This time there are some size shrinkage:
>>
>>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
>>    2530598	 174661	  28288	2733547	 29b5eb	fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko - upstream master
>>
>>  	text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
>>  	2530774	 174661	  28288	2733723	 29b69b	fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko - before tree-log cleanup
>>
>>     text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
>> 	2530163	 174661	  28288	2733112	 29b438	fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko - both series applied 
>>
>> So the net result of the 2 series is 435 bytes and I assume there 
>> will be further reduction in size once further cleanups are made 
>>
>> Changes since v1: 
>>  * Rebased all patche to latest master
>>
>> Nikolay Borisov (24):
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_must_commit_transaction take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_record_unlink_dir take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_record_snapshot_destroy take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_inode_in_log take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_log_new_name take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_del_dir_entries_in_log take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_del_inode_ref take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make logged_inode_size take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_check_ref_name_override take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make copy_items take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_log_all_xattrs take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_log_trailing_hole take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_get_logged_extents take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_log_changed_extents take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make log_dir_items take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make log_directory_changes take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make log_new_dir_dentries take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_unlink_inode take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make drop_one_dir_item take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make __add_inode_ref take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make log_inode_item take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make btrfs_log_inode take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make count_inode_extrefs take btrfs_inode
>>   btrfs: Make count_inode_refs take btrfs_inode
> 
> Added to 4.11 queue, thanks. There were several 80+ lines added by the
> patches, I've updated the patches during review. Please be more careful
> with changes like this
> 
> From https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9522051/
> 
> -	if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ||
> +	if (S_ISDIR(inode->vfs_inode.i_mode) ||
>  	    (!test_bit(BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC,
> -		       &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags) &&
> -	     inode_only >= LOG_INODE_EXISTS))
> +		       &inode->runtime_flags) &&
> +	     inode_only == LOG_INODE_EXISTS))
> 
> Notice the change from >= to == .

Yeah, I did notice this after the rebase I did when you told me patch 6
wasn't applying cleanly, however I thought I had fixed it during the
rebase. Apparently I do need to recheck things one more time for good
measure.

Anyway, thanks for pulling!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux