On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:05:17AM -0500, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > On 2017-01-10 10:47, Hugo Mills wrote: > >On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:42:51AM -0500, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > >>Most of the issue in this case is with the size of the initial > >>chunk. That said, I've got quite a few reasonably sized filesystems > >>(I think the largest is 200GB) with moderate usage (max 90GB of > >>data), and none of them are using more than the first 16kB block in > >>the System chunk. While I'm not necessarily a typical user, I'd be > >>willing to bet based on this that in general, most people who aren't > >>storing very large amounts of data or taking huge numbers of > >>snapshots aren't going to need a system chunk much bigger than 1MB. > > > > Again, the system chunk has *nothing* to do with snapshots. > Apologies, I somehow completely missed the part of your first reply > where you commented on that... There was quite a lot of it. :) Hugo. -- Hugo Mills | Anyone who claims their cryptographic protocol is hugo@... carfax.org.uk | secure is either a genius or a fool. Given the http://carfax.org.uk/ | genius/fool ratio for our species, the odds aren't PGP: E2AB1DE4 | good. Bruce Schneier
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
