Hi. If btrfs check does not display error messages, the filesystem is ok. I do not have enough knowledge to analyze your data. But if you're sure that all filesystems do not have problems, the problem is the parent subvolume in the receiving filesystem. Regards. Gdb Rene Wolf: > Hi > > > As the fs in question is my root, I tried the following using a live usb > stick of a xubuntu 16.10: > > > Checking filesystem on /dev/sdb1 > > UUID: 122ecca7-9804-4c8a-b4ed-42fd6c6bbe7a > > checking extents [o] > > checking free space cache [.] > > checking fs roots [o] > > found 40577679360 bytes used err is 0 > > total csum bytes: 39027548 > > total tree bytes: 571277312 > > total fs tree bytes: 453001216 > > total extent tree bytes: 71745536 > > btree space waste bytes: 116244847 > > file data blocks allocated: 46952968192 > > referenced 44081487872 > > "err is 0" ... so I guess that means everything is fine? > ]zac[ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
