On Friday, December 09, 2016 09:09:29 AM Qu Wenruo wrote: > > At 12/08/2016 09:56 PM, Chandan Rajendra wrote: > > migrate_super_block() uses sectorsize to refer to the size of the > > superblock. Hence on 64k sectorsize filesystems, it ends up computing > > checksum beyond the super block length (i.e. > > BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE). This commit fixes the bug by using > > BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE instead of sectorsize of the underlying > > filesystem. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > BTW would you please enhance the convert tests? > Current convert tests only uses 4K as block size. > So adding 64K blocksize would definitely improve the tests. > Thanks for the hint. I just executed btrfs/012 with 64k blocksize hardcoded and found that 'btrfs rollback' failed. I will fix rollback first and then work on getting btrfs/012 to support 64k blocksize. -- chandan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
