Re: [PATCH 1/1] btrfs: fix improper return value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 12:51:53PM +0800, Pan Bian wrote:
> In function btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate(), errno is assigned to variable ret
> on errors. However, it directly returns 0. It may be better to return
> ret. This patch also removes the warning, because the caller already
> prints a warning.
> 
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188731

Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx>

> Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c
> index 7fc89e4..83bb2f2 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c
> @@ -351,7 +351,5 @@ int btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>  
>  out:
>  	btrfs_free_path(path);
> -	if (ret)
> -		btrfs_warn(fs_info, "btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate failed %d", ret);
> -	return 0;
> +	return ret;
>  }
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux