Old test cases in btrfs qgroup test group use fixed golden output.
This limits the coverage, since mount option like compress and
inode_cache and populate output easily.
On the other hand, "btrfs check" has support for checking qgroup
correctness at least from 3 kernel release before.
And that function is proved to be stable and helped to exposed quite a
lot of qgroup bugs.
So this patchset will use "btrfs check --qgroup-report" to replace fixed
golden output, and add extra check for some existing test cases.
This will reduce false alerts and improve the coverage.
In fact, with these patches and "-o inode_cache" mount option, we have
already exposed a new qgroup bug.
Qu Wenruo (10):
fstests: common: Introduce function to check qgroup correctness
fstests: btrfs/017: Use new _btrfs_check_scratch_qgroup function
fstests: btrfs/022: Add extra qgroup verification after each work
fstests: btrfs/028: Use new wrapped _btrfs_check_scratch_qgroup
function
fstests: btrfs/042: Add extra qgroup verification
fstests: btrfs/091: Use _btrfs_check_scratch_qgroup other than fixed
golden output
fstests: btrfs/099: Add extra verification for qgroup
fstests: btrfs/104: Use _btrfs_check_scratch_qgroup to replace open
codes
fstests: btrfs/122: Use _btrfs_check_scratch_qgroup to replace open
code
fstests: btrfs/123: Use _btrfs_check_scratch_qgroup to replace open
code
common/rc | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
tests/btrfs/017 | 4 ++--
tests/btrfs/017.out | 2 --
tests/btrfs/022 | 5 +++++
tests/btrfs/028 | 4 ++--
tests/btrfs/042 | 3 +++
tests/btrfs/091 | 5 ++---
tests/btrfs/091.out | 4 ----
tests/btrfs/099 | 3 +++
tests/btrfs/104 | 11 ++---------
tests/btrfs/122 | 9 ++-------
tests/btrfs/123 | 4 +---
12 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
