On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So I don't think it's related. Yours looks like some subtle timer base > > race. It smells like a locking problem with timers. I'm not seeing > > what it might be, but it *might* have been fixed by doing the > > TIMER_MIGRATING bit right in add_timer_on() (commit 22b886dd1018). 4.1 does not have the new fangled timer wheel. So 22b886dd1018 is irrelevant. > > Adding some timer people just in case, but I don't think your 4.1 > > report is related. This looks like one of the classic issues where an enqueued timer gets freed/reinitialized or otherwise manipulated. So yes, Ingos recommendation for debugging is the right thing to do. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
