On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 14:57:48 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > btrfs/022 was spitting a warning for the case that we exceed the quota. If we > fail to make our quota reservation we need to clean up our data space > reservation. Thanks, > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx> > --- > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 9 +++------ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > index 03da2f6..d72eaae 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > @@ -4286,13 +4286,10 @@ int btrfs_check_data_free_space(struct inode *inode, u64 start, u64 len) > if (ret < 0) > return ret; > > - /* > - * Use new btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data to reserve precious data space > - * > - * TODO: Find a good method to avoid reserve data space for NOCOW > - * range, but don't impact performance on quota disable case. > - */ > + /* Use new btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data to reserve precious data space. */ > ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, start, len); > + if (ret) > + btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota(inode, start, len); > return ret; > } > > -- > 2.7.4 This came up before, though slightly different: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg56644.html Which version is correct - with or without _noquota ? -h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
