Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fuzzer test fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> And special notes for the BUG_ON fix:
>> The fix just fixes a small corner, while tons of BUG_ON()/abort() are
>> still here and there.
>> We need quite a lot of boring work to handle them later.
>
> Yeah yeah, that's been neglected for a very long time. The kernel has
> the abort_transaction infrastructure, the userspace hasn't been updated
> in the same way. Long way to go, but every removed bug_on counts.

I've been holding back more images that reach abort() as their coming
is pretty clear and actually don't need any fuzzing: Every code path
that eventually leads to abort() will get executed sooner or later. As
of now, there are 50 unique code paths that reach abort(). Somebody
has to bite the bullet and add some error paths :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux