[PATCH 1/5] btrfs-progs: fsck: Check drop level before walking through fs tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Exposed by fuzzed image from Lukas, which contains invalid drop level
(16), causing segfault when accessing path->nodes[drop_level].

This patch will check drop level against fs tree level and
BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL to avoid such problem.

Reported-by: Lukas Lueg <lukas.lueg@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 cmds-check.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/cmds-check.c b/cmds-check.c
index 1e1f7c9..2aa0a7b 100644
--- a/cmds-check.c
+++ b/cmds-check.c
@@ -3742,6 +3742,11 @@ static int check_fs_root(struct btrfs_root *root,
 		btrfs_disk_key_to_cpu(&key, &root_item->drop_progress);
 		level = root_item->drop_level;
 		path.lowest_level = level;
+		if (level > btrfs_header_level(root->node) ||
+		    level >= BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL) {
+			error("ignoring invalid drop level: %u", level);
+			goto skip_walking;
+		}
 		wret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, &key, &path, 0, 0);
 		if (wret < 0)
 			goto skip_walking;
-- 
2.9.3



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux