On 08/24/2016 05:07 AM, Filipe Manana wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx> wrote:Suppose you have the following tree in snap1 on a file system mounted with -o inode_cache so that inode numbers are recycled └── [ 258] a └── [ 257] b and then you remove b, rename a to c, and then re-create b in c so you have the following tree └── [ 258] c └── [ 257] b and then you try to do an incremental send you will hit ASSERT(pending_move == 0);Hi Josef, Would you care submitting a regression test for xfstests? The change looks good to me.
Yeah I sent one yesterday, btrfs/131. Thanks, Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
